Guaranty Law is Unconstitutional

Hot off the presses!

The NYC Guaranty Law, on March 31, 2023, was found unconstitutional after the matter was remanded to the Southern District Court by the Second Circuit, in the case of Melendez v. City of New York.

To sum up the 33-page decision, the Court granted the plaintiff summary judgment and held that: “The City has proven unable to provide record evidence to answer the “five serious concerns about [the Guaranty Law] being a reasonable and appropriate means to pursue the professed public purpose,” as the Second Circuit instructed.” The Court therefore “concludes that the Law violates the Contracts Clause by rendering the guaranty clauses in Plaintiffs’ commercial leases unenforceable for unpaid rent during the covered period, March 7, 2020 and June 30, 2021.”

As we know, the New York City Guaranty Law, voided a crucial provision negotiated into commercial leases, and it did so irrespective of a showing that the affected guarantor owned the business, was in financial need or that the owner would reopen the business following the pandemic. The law also ignored the financial needs and expectations that induced the landlord to enter the Contract/Lease with the Commercial Tenant and guarantor in the first instance. The law however, has been found unconstitutional, as it violates the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution.

What is the take away here? Landlords may enforce the guaranties tied to their commercial leases, affected by Covid, for the Covid period from March 7, 2020 – June 30, 2021. Guarantors remain liable for the rent due that was not paid during the Covid period. There is no longer protection afforded to the guarantors during this period. Lawsuits can still be commenced for monies that remain due and owing during this time, as the statute of limitations on a contract is six years. There is still time to sue. If a claim has been dismissed due to the unconstitutional Guaranty Law, a motion to renew may be in order. Terms of guaranties may vary however, and must be reviewed to determine the proper course and applicability. Please feel free to contact one of the partners at the law firm of SDK Heiberger, LLP to discuss your options. However, for now, please take a moment to read the well written reasoned decision, just issued today!

SDK HEIBERGER TEAM

Stuart Rittschof
Northstation is a design studio in London and Berlin. We help organisations communicate more effectively through smart design. We aim to provide our clients with responsive, flexible and cost-effective solutions for their communication needs. Our clients are varied and our work takes many forms: visual identities and branding, presentations, reports, printed media, photography and websites. We are members of Behance and 52 Network and often collaborate with other creatives on projects. Please contact Stuart Rittschof, Creative Director, if you'd like to discuss your project. stuart@northstationery.com
www.northstation.biz
Previous
Previous

Garages in NYC May Face Strict Penalties Under New Laws

Next
Next

How to Implement HUD Guidelines with Respect to Criminals and the Fair Housing Act